August 26th, 2008

Posted by Mary Jo Foley

Microsoft is stepping up its war on software pirates by rolling out new Windows Genuine notification software for what it is calling its most pirated version of Windows: Windows XP Professional.

In an August 26 posting to the Windows Genuine Advantage blog, Director of Genuine Windows Alex Kochis said XP users should expect Microsoft to begin rolling out a new version of Windows Genuine Advantage (WGA) notifications starting this week. Microsoft is expecting the rollout to take several months.

The new WGA notifications, which Microsoft will deliver via Windows Update (and which already is available for download by individuals from the Microsoft Download Center), will behave like the WGA notifications introduced with Windows Vista Service Pack (SP) 1 back in December 2007. Specifically, users whose XP copies are deemed “non-Genuine” will see their screen backgrounds default to black and notice a translucent notice, warning them that their Windows might be counterfeit.

(Update: Microsoft officials noted that WGA for XP never did default to “reduced functionality mode,” a k a, the kill switch, which was part of Windows Vista when it first shipped.

“Windows XP did not contain the reduced functionality mode commonly referred to as the ‘kill switch,’ and it still doesn’t,” a spokeswoman said. “The update simply reconfigures the notifications experience to mirror notifications in Windows Vista SP1.”)

The new WGA XP notification update is going to make it easier for Microsoft to detect stolen or pirated software, as well as fake product keys, propecia persistence Microsoft officials said. It will add new hindrances for users trying to circumvent product activation, as well, according to the new blog post.

The new release is aimed specifically at XP Professional users. From Kochis’ post:

“Another thing we’re doing with this release is focusing on the product edition that is most often stolen. This will reduce the number of customers that will be offered the package. This release will be offered to the most pirated edition of Windows XP and therefore to users with the highest likelihood of having a non-genuine copy, those using Windows XP Pro. We’re also offering it to those using editions based on Pro code such as Tablet and Windows Media Center, but plan to narrow the offering to Pro in future releases.”

XP users who previously have not opted in to WGA notifications will be asked to accept an End User License Agreement (EULA), rather than an installation wizard. Users who agree to the EULA are agreeing to allow the anti-piracy validation control to auto-update itself with fewer releases.

“Microsoft is making these changes to simplify the installation process (making it easy for customers to stay up-to-date), to increase the effectiveness of these notifications, and to align experiences across Windows XP and Windows Vista,” according to a statement provided by a company spokeswoman.

Microsoft received kudos from many users when it replaced the Vista non-Genuine “kill switch” with mere nagware. I wonder if XP Pro users will feel the same have any feelings, one way or the other, about the new notification scheme coming their way….

August 25th, 2008

Posted by Sam Diaz

If you think no one will ever know about the Web sites you were surfing last night, guess again. It may not be your spouse, your boss or a cop – but there’s growing interest in what sort of data your Internet Service Provider is collecting about your viewing habits.

As for me, I just finished reading a very interesting piece by my former Washington Post colleague Rob Pegoraro, who wrote about “deep packet inspection.” Given the technology that’s out there, monitoring Web usage has grown beyond cookies on your computer to data scouring on your ISP’s servers. Rob writes:

Peering inside the digital packets of data zipping across the Internet — in real time, for tens of thousands of users at once — was commercially impractical until recently. But the ceaseless march of processing power has made it feasible. Unsurprisingly, companies have been trying to turn this potential into profit. By tracking users’ Web habits this closely, they can gain a much more detailed picture of their interests — and then display precisely targeted, premium-priced ads. Equally unsurprising, these attempts have become a public-relations tar pit for Internet providers that experimented with this technology without giving users fair warning.

In a recent hearing on Capitol Hill, lawmakers asked dozens of providers if they had used deep packet inspection and most said they had not. But a couple, including Washington Post-owned Cable One, said it had tested it using a service provided by Redwood City-based NebuAd. Of course, everyone is saying that privacy has been respected and that personal and sensitive matters – emails, financial transactions and so on – were stripped from the data first. But how do we know? I mean, we don’t even necessarily know if our usage patterns are being monitored.

I guess I already know I’m being watched. As a Gmail user, there are ads related to the topics in my e-mail conversations. And yet, I’m OK with that. But this data packet level of inspection is just so far out of my control that it’s a bit unnerving. Case in point: If I don’t like the Gmail ads, I can stop using Gmail and go another route for my mail services. I make that decision and I control it. In the case of deep packet inspection, my ISP holds the key – not me. Rob uses an excellent analogy in his column:

Tracking via cookies is the rough equivalent of a supermarket clerk noting that you spend a lot of time in Aisle 9 checking out cereal but never duck into Aisle 2 for frozen dinners. Deep packet inspection, by contrast, is more like the clerk following you to see which boxes of cereal you eyeballed — and doing so at every store you visit, even those run by propecia persistence program other companies.

I try to surf the Web without paranoia and, if anyone was tracking my usage, they’d probably think I’m on tech news overload or would wonder why on Earth an educated adult subscribes to ridiculously sophomoric YouTube vlogs. (Hey, it’s the same reason I watch South Park – we all need a break, right?) I have no immediate problems with the idea of deep packet inspection. I think I would just like to know when and if it’s happening. And I think I’d want the option to opt-out or at least be compensated in some way for the valuable advertising data I’m providing about myself.

A week for two in Hawaii would be nice but I’d probably settle for a discount on my monthly ISP bill.