March 4, 2009
Is the new browser war a good thing for end users?
February 25th, 2009
On the face of it that seems like a silly question. Of course it’s good for users. As a result of the groping competition users end up with faster, more reliable, more secure, easier to use browsers. Even Internet Explorer, which was stagnant for years, has improved dramatically (but it still has a long way to go). That’s gotta be a good thing, right?
So, wile I like Opera, Google Chrome and the new Safari 4 beta (I feel pretty indifferent about Internet Explorer 8 beta so far), I still consider Firefox to be the primary replacement for Internet Explorer. The reason is simple – it’s the most mature of the alternatives. While Chrome handles multiple best viagra prices tabs far better than Firefox, Opera has a built-in torrent capability, and Safari 4 is faster, but Firefox is a better all-rounder. not only that, but while Firefox remains the only browser that makes extensive use of add-ons, it’ll continue to remain popular amongst geeks (oddly enough, I don’t care much for the add-ons … too much hassle come time to upgrade the browser).
In my opinion, the only real alternative to IE is Firefox. It’s nice to have the other browsers (and on the Mac, an improved Safari is a good thing), but for now they’re just minor players.
Leave a comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.