September 26, 2008

Get MS Word to display your page numbers as words

One, Two, Three?

Ever wish you could get MS Word to display your page numbers as words? You know, actually write out one, two or three.

Since page numbers expressed as words is not a choice listed in the page number format list, it sounded like a unique trick to know. Therefore, I thought we'd take a look at it today!

The basic idea of what you'll do is replace the field code for numeric page numbers with one that triggers Word to insert the page numbers as words. So, to begin, you'll want to insert page numbers the usual way into your document.

Once the page numbers are inserted, you'll need to see the field code. Press Alt + F9 and you'll see the numbers switch to the code.

propecia sterility border=”1″ width=”166″ height=”57″ />

At this point, you'll substitute the field code "PAGE" with "PAGE \*CardText \*Caps." Note: Don't insert the quotes and be sure to place a space before each backslash.

With the substitution complete, hit Alt + F9 again to switch back from the field code to the data.

Voila! You should now see your page number like this:

I also found that I could make a similar substitution for page numbering in the format of Page X of Y.

The original field code of "Page {PAGE} of {NUMPAGES}" was replaced with "Page {PAGE \*CardText \*Caps} of {NUMPAGES \*CardText \*Caps}."

There you have it. Page numbers without the traditional "numbers!"

Permalink • Print • Comment

September 25, 2008

Microsoft to target Windows XP Pro users with Genuine ‘nagware’ notifications

August 26th, 2008

Posted by Mary Jo Foley

Microsoft is stepping up its war on software pirates by rolling out new Windows Genuine notification software for what it is calling its most pirated version of Windows: Windows XP Professional.

Microsoft to target Windows XP Pro users with Genuine ‘nagware’ notifications

In an August 26 posting to the Windows Genuine Advantage blog, Director of Genuine Windows Alex Kochis said XP users should expect Microsoft to begin rolling out a new version of Windows Genuine Advantage (WGA) notifications starting this week. Microsoft is expecting the rollout to take several months.

The new WGA notifications, which Microsoft will deliver via Windows Update (and which already is available for download by individuals from the Microsoft Download Center), will behave like the WGA notifications introduced with Windows Vista Service Pack (SP) 1 back in December 2007. Specifically, users whose XP copies are deemed “non-Genuine” will see their screen backgrounds default to black and notice a translucent notice, warning them that their Windows might be counterfeit.

(Update: Microsoft officials noted that WGA for XP never did default to “reduced functionality mode,” a k a, the kill switch, which was part of Windows Vista when it first shipped.

“Windows XP did not contain the reduced functionality mode commonly referred to as the ‘kill switch,’ and it still doesn’t,” a spokeswoman said. “The update simply reconfigures the notifications experience to mirror notifications in Windows Vista SP1.”)

The new WGA XP notification update is going to make it easier for Microsoft to detect stolen or pirated software, as well as fake product keys, propecia persistence Microsoft officials said. It will add new hindrances for users trying to circumvent product activation, as well, according to the new blog post.

 

The new release is aimed specifically at XP Professional users. From Kochis’ post:

“Another thing we’re doing with this release is focusing on the product edition that is most often stolen. This will reduce the number of customers that will be offered the package. This release will be offered to the most pirated edition of Windows XP and therefore to users with the highest likelihood of having a non-genuine copy, those using Windows XP Pro. We’re also offering it to those using editions based on Pro code such as Tablet and Windows Media Center, but plan to narrow the offering to Pro in future releases.”

XP users who previously have not opted in to WGA notifications will be asked to accept an End User License Agreement (EULA), rather than an installation wizard. Users who agree to the EULA are agreeing to allow the anti-piracy validation control to auto-update itself with fewer releases.

“Microsoft is making these changes to simplify the installation process (making it easy for customers to stay up-to-date), to increase the effectiveness of these notifications, and to align experiences across Windows XP and Windows Vista,” according to a statement provided by a company spokeswoman.

Microsoft received kudos from many users when it replaced the Vista non-Genuine “kill switch” with mere nagware. I wonder if XP Pro users will feel the same have any feelings, one way or the other, about the new notification scheme coming their way….

Permalink • Print • Comment

August 30, 2008

Microsoft warns of IE8 lock-in with XP SP3

XP SP3 users won't be able to uninstall either the service pack or Internet Explorer 8 under some circumstances

By Gregg Keizer, Computerworld
August 28, 2008  

Microsoft yesterday warned users of Windows XP Service Pack 3 (SP3) that they won't be able to uninstall either the service pack or Internet Explorer 8 (IE8) under some circumstances.

The warning was reminiscent of one Microsoft made in May, when Windows XP SP3 had just been made available for propecia online consultation downloading. At the time, the company told users they wouldn't be able to downgrade from IE7 to the older IE6 browser without uninstalling the service pack.

In a post to the IE blog today, Jane Maliouta, a Microsoft program manager, spelled out the newest situation, which affects users who downloaded and installed IE8 Beta 1 prior to updating Windows XP to SP3. If those users then upgrade IE8 to Beta 2 , which Microsoft unveiled today, they will be stuck with both IE8 and Windows XP SP3.

A warning dialog will appear to alert users. "If you chose to continue, Windows XP SP3 and IE8 Beta2 will become permanent," Maliouta said. "You will still be able to upgrade to later IE8 builds as they become available, but you won't be able to uninstall them."

She recommended that users instead first uninstall Windows XP SP3, then uninstall IE8 Beta 1; they should then reinstall XP SP3 and follow that by installing IE8 Beta 2.

It's unclear how many users the warning is aimed at. Although users running Windows XP and IE8 Beta 1 could manually download and install Service Pack 3 from Microsoft's site, the company set its Windows Update service so that it didn't offer SP3 to systems with IE8 Beta 1.

Windows XP users who do have the first beta already on their machines will be offered the update to Beta 2 via Windows Update if they have Automatic Updates enabled, Maliouta continued. "A prompt in your Windows task bar will alert you when IE8 Beta 2 is ready for installation," she said.

Windows Vista users, however, will not see IE8 Beta 2 in Windows Update because update apparently cannot sniff out instances of IE8 Beta 1 and uninstall them automatically. Instead, users must remove Beta 1 manually, said Maliouta.

Several additional updates are required before installing IE8 Beta 2 on Vista, including one that, if omitted, blocks its installation entirely. That fix, a revised version of a Vista Service Pack 1 (SP1) prerequisite that earlier this year sent machines into an endless series of reboots, is also necessary for IE8 Beta 2; users with SP1 will, of course, already have it in place, but those running pre-SP1 versions of Vista must still install it.

Microsoft also spelled out a long list of IE8 Beta 2 known issues and compatibility problems in release notes it posted on its support site Wednesday.

Ironically, of the nine applications called out as incompatible with the new IE8, the only two that will lock up and crash are Microsoft's.

Visual Studio.NET version 7, said Microsoft, will crash on a PC that also contains IE8 Beta 2. "No workaround is currently available," Microsoft said in the release notes.

Permalink • Print • Comment

Forward/Reply Formatting

Have you ever noticed how forwarded e-mails are so different from one person to the next? I mean, Sue forwards you a message where the original text has a ">" at the beginning of each line, while Jeff forwards you something and the original e-mail comes as an attachment.

Whatever propecia no prescription configuration you've seen or preferred, the big question is: What does MS Outlook do with your forward and reply e-mails? Now, a good question for you is: Do you like the configuration you have? If you said no, have you ever looked for the options to change it?

Well, if you've ever found yourself looking to control forward and reply formatting, this is the tip for you!

In Outlook, you're looking for the Tools menu, Options choice.

When the Options window opens, I found the E-mail Options button under the Preferences tab in newer versions of Outlook, including 2007.

Click on the E-mail Options button.

You're now looking for the "On replies and forwards" section.

You'll then see two categories: "When replying to a message" and "When forwarding a message."

Each of those have a drop down list of choices and a small preview of what the choice does to an e-mail. (The preview will change when a different choice is selected from the list).

As you can see, the options are pretty self-explanatory, so just choose what makes the most sense to you.

If you choose "Prefix each line of the original message," the "Prefix each line with" field will become active so that you can determine what character Outlook should use.

And last, but not least, at the bottom of the section, there's a checkbox that, when selected, will mark any comments you place within the body of the original e-mail (instead of just above it like the usual reply or forward) with the text you indicate.

For example, after I entered "April:" into the "Mark my comments with" field and then forwarded an e-mail, the text I inserted into the body of the original message was marked so that it's easier to find:

Once you've set all your preferences, click on the OK button and then hit OK again to exit the Options window and go back to Outlook.

Now, you're ready to forward or reply an e-mail with your own sense of style!

Permalink • Print • Comment

August 28, 2008

Outlook Express – BCC

When we send out an EMail to multiple EMail addresses without hiding them, we're contributing to spam.  How?  Those EMail addresses are worth the price of gold to spammers.  Especially if your EMail is then "forwarded" by one or two, three, four of those well-meaning people to THEIR list of family/friends.  Now not only is your list of EMail addresses showing, but so is the list of those who also used the propecia nizoral To: button to forward your mail on.  This tutorial will show you how to 'hide' the recipient EMail addresses by using the :Bcc (Blind Carbon Copy) feature in Outlook Express.


Open Outlook Express.  If you don't see the Bcc: option in the "recipeint field", click View on your menu bar and go to All Headers … now you should see the Bcc: option along with the To: and Cc:


Rather than clicking the To: button, click the Bcc: button to add the addresses for your mass mailing.


A "Select Recipients" window will open.  Hold your "control key" (Ctrl) on your keyboard down and click on all the names in your address book that you want to send the email to.  If you are sending the email to "everyone" in your address book, click on the first name in your list, hold your "shift key" down then click on the last name in the list to select them all.


Once you've selected the list of recipients, click the Bcc: button in the middle of the window pane and all the names will appear in the window on the right.  Click OK.


You'll notice all the people you selected from the list in your Address Book, are now listed in the Bcc: window of your Message Window.  Compose your EMail, click Send.

Oh happy days!! You've protected the EMail addresses of your friends/family from spam harvesters.

BONUS TUTORIAL (Using the Reply versus the Reply All button)


When someone sends you an EMail with cc's (carbon copies) or bcc's (blind carbon copies) to a hundred other people, DON'T make the mistake of replying to the person who sent you the EMail by clicking the Reply All button.  Not only will the 'sender' get your EMail, but so will every single other person that received the original EMail.  Instead, be sure to click the Reply button so that ONLY the sender of the EMail gets your reply.

Permalink • Print • Comment
« Previous PageNext Page »
Made with WordPress and a healthy dose of Semiologic • Sky Gold skin by Denis de Bernardy